CONSTITUTIONAL legal rights FOUNDATION Bill of rights in Action

Spring 2004 (20:2)

Developments in Democracy

BRIA 20:2 house | exactly how Women won the best to poll | have Women accomplished Equality? | Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and also Rousseau top top Government

Three bucks for Bill of civil liberties in Action?We room proud to lug you Bill of legal rights in action (BRIA) four times a year . . . Complimentary of charge!We likewise know you, our faithful readers, love the rich and interactive class in every issue.Wouldn’t you choose to pitch in $3 to assist us save BRIA coming to her mailbox?That’s right, we’re just asking for a $3 tax-deductible donation, which might seem small. Yet to us, that huge!

Donate Now!

Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and also Rousseau top top Government

Starting in the 1600s, european philosophers started debating the inquiry of who have to govern a nation. As the absolute dominance of kings weakened, knowledge philosophers said for various forms of democracy.

You are watching: What topics were addressed by the philosophes in their encyclopedia articles?

In 1649, a polite war broke out over who would rule England—Parliament or King Charles I. The war finished with the beheading of the king. Shortly after Charles was executed, one English philosopher, thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), composed Leviathan, a defense the the absolute strength of kings. The title of the book referred to a leviathan, a mythological, whale-like sea monster the devoured totality ships. Hobbes likened the leviathan come government, a an effective state developed to i charged order.

Hobbes began Leviathan by relenten the “state of nature” wherein all individuals were normally equal. Every person was free to carry out what he or she required to execute to survive. As a result, everyone suffered from “continued fear and also danger of violent death; and the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

In the state of nature, there to be no regulations or anyone to enforce them. The only way out that this situation, Hobbes said, to be for people to develop some supreme strength to impose tranquility on everyone.

Hobbes borrowed a principle from English contract law: an include agreement. Hobbes asserted the the human being agreed amongst themselves to “lay down” their natural rights the equality and freedom and also give absolute power to a sovereign. The sovereign, developed by the people, could be a person or a group. The sovereign would certainly make and also enforce the regulations to for sure a tranquil society, making life, liberty, and also property possible. Hobbes referred to as this commitment the “social contract.”

Hobbes thought that a government headed through a king was the best form that the sovereign can take. Put all power in the hands of a king would mean much more resolute and also consistent exercise of politics authority, Hobbes argued. Hobbes likewise maintained that the social contract was an commitment only amongst the people and also not in between them and also their king. As soon as the people had given absolute power to the king, they had no best to revolt versus him.

Hobbes warned against the church meddling v the king’s government. The feared religious beliefs could end up being a resource of civil war. Thus, he advised that the church end up being a department of the king government, i beg your pardon would very closely control all religious affairs. In any conflict in between divine and royal law, Hobbes wrote, the individual must obey the king or choose death.

But the work of absolute kings were numbered. A new age v fresh concepts was emerging—the europe Enlightenment.

Enlightenment thinkers want to enhance human conditions on planet rather than concern themselves v religion and the afterlife. These thinkers valued reason, science, spiritual tolerance, and also what they referred to as “natural rights”—life, liberty, and property.

Enlightenment theorists John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all arisen theories of federal government in which some or even all the world would govern. These thinkers had a profound result on the American and also French revolutions and the democratic governments the they produced.

Locke: The wake up Democrat

John Locke (1632–1704) to be born shortly before the English polite War. Locke studied science and also medicine at Oxford University and became a professor there. He sided through the protestant Parliament against the roman Catholic King James II in the Glorious change of 1685. This event reduced the power of the king and made parliament the major authority in English government.

In 1690, Locke published his 2 Treatises the Government. He normally agreed through Hobbes about the brutality of the state that nature, which required a society contract to guarantee peace. Yet he disagreed v Hobbes ~ above two significant points.

First, Locke said that organic rights such as life, liberty, and also property exist in the state of nature and also could never ever be taken away or even voluntarily offered up through individuals. These civil liberties were “inalienable” (impossible come surrender). Locke likewise disagreed with Hobbes about the society contract. For him, it to be not just an agreement amongst the people, but in between them and also the can be fried (preferably a king).

According to Locke, the natural rights of individuals restricted the strength of the king. The king walk not hold absolute power, as Hobbes had said, yet acted only to enforce and also protect the organic rights of the people. If a can be fried violated this rights, the social contract to be broken, and also the civilization had the best to revolt and also establish a brand-new government. Much less than 100 years after Locke wrote his two Treatises the Government, cutting board Jefferson provided his theory in creating the explanation of Independence.

Although Locke spoke out for freedom of thought, speech, and also religion, he thought property to be the most vital natural right. He asserted that owners may do every little thing they want v their building as long as they carry out not attack the rights of others. Government, he said, to be mainly essential to encourage the “public good,” the is to protect property and also encourage business and little else. “Govern lightly,” Locke said.

Locke favored a representative federal government such together the English Parliament, which had a hereditary residence of Lords and an elected House that Commons. Yet he want representatives to be only males of property and business. Consequently, just adult male home owners should can vote. Locke was reluctant to allow the propertyless masses of human being to participate in government since he believed that they to be unfit.

The can be fried authority that government, Locke said, must reside in the law-making legislature, choose England’s Parliament. The executive (prime minister) and also courts would be creations of the legislature and under that is authority.

Montesquieu: The balanced Democrat

When Charles Montesquieu (1689–1755) to be born, France to be ruled by an pure king, louis XIV. Montesquieu to be born right into a noble family and also educated in the law. The traveled extensively throughout Europe, consisting of England, wherein he learned the Parliament. In 1722, he composed a book, ridiculing the regime of louis XIV and also the doctrines of the roman Catholic Church.

Montesquieu released his greatest work, The soul of the Laws, in 1748. Unequal Hobbes and also Locke, Montesquieu believed that in the state of nature individuals were therefore fearful that they avoided violence and also war. The require for food, Montesquieu said, brought about the timid people to associate v others and seek come live in a society. “As soon as male enters into a state that society,” Montesquieu wrote, “he loser the feeling of his weakness, equality ceases, and also then commences the state the war.”

Montesquieu walk not describe a social contract as such. Yet he claimed that the state the war amongst individuals and nations led to human being laws and government.

Montesquieu wrote that the key purpose of federal government is to maintain law and also order, politics liberty, and also the residential or commercial property of the individual. Montesquieu protest the pure monarchy that his residence country and also favored the English device as the finest model the government.

Montesquieu rather misinterpreted how political strength was actually exercised in England. Once he wrote The spirit of the Laws, power was focused pretty lot in Parliament, the nationwide legislature. Montesquieu believed he experienced a separation and also balancing of the strength of federal government in England.

Montesquieu regarded the English king as working out executive power well balanced by the law-making Parliament, which to be itself separated into the residence of Lords and also the house of Commons, every checking the other. Then, the executive and also legislative branches were still further balanced by an elevation court system.

Montesquieu concluded the the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and also judicial powers to be separate and kept each various other in check to prevent any kind of branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting this powers, together in the monarchy that Louis XIV, would lead to despotism. While Montesquieu’s separation that powers concept did not accurately describe the government of England, americans later adopted it together the foundation of the U.S. Constitution.

Rousseau: The excessive Democrat

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) was born in Geneva, Switzerland, wherein all adult male citizens can vote for a representative government. Rousseau travel in France and also Italy, educating himself.

In 1751, he won an essay contest. His fresh watch that male was naturally an excellent and was corrupted by culture made that a celebrity in the French salons whereby artists, scientists, and writers gathered to comment on the latest ideas.

A few years later on he published one more essay in i beg your pardon he explained savages in a state the nature together free, equal, peaceful, and happy. As soon as people started to insurance claim ownership of property, Rousseau argued, inequality, murder, and also war resulted.

According to Rousseau, the powerful rich stole the soil belonging to everyone and also fooled the common human being into accepting them together rulers. Rousseau concluded that the social contract was no a willing agreement, as Hobbes, Locke, and also Montesquieu had actually believed, but a fraud against the world committed through the rich.

In 1762, Rousseau published his most essential work on political theory, The society Contract. His opening line is still striking today: “Man is born free, and everywhere that is in chains.” Rousseau agreed v Locke the the individual must never be compelled to offer up his or her natural rights to a king.

The problem in the state that nature, Rousseau said, was to uncover a means to defend everyone’s life, liberty, and property when each person remained free. Rousseau’s systems was for civilization to go into into a social contract. Castle would give up all their rights, no to a king, but to “the entirety community,” all the people. He called all the people the “sovereign,” a term used by Hobbes to mainly refer to a king. The people then worked out their “general will” to make legislations for the “public good.”

Rousseau suggested that the general will of the world could no be determined by chosen representatives. He believed in a direct democracy in which anyone voted come express the basic will and to make the legislations of the land. Rousseau had actually in mental a democracy on a small scale, a city-state favor his aboriginal Geneva.

In Rousseau’s democracy, anyone that disobeyed the general will the the human being “will be compelled to it is in free.” He believed that citizens should obey the regulations or be compelled to execute so as lengthy as they continued to be a resident of the state. This is a “civil state,” Rousseau says, where security, justice, liberty, and also property room protected and enjoyed through all.

All political power, follow to Rousseau, have to reside with the people, exercising their general will. There can be no separation that powers, as Montesquieu proposed. The people, conference together, will certainly deliberate personally on laws and then by bulk vote discover the general will. Rousseau’s general will was later embodied in the native “We the people . . .” in ~ the beginning of the U.S. Constitution.

Rousseau was rather vague ~ above the mechanics of how his democracy would certainly work. There would certainly be a government of sorts, entrusted with administering the basic will. But it would be written of “mere officials” who acquired their orders from the people.

Rousseau believed that religion divided and also weakened the state. “It is impossible to live in tranquility with human being you think room damned,” the said. He favored a “civil religion” that accepted God, however concentrated top top the sacredness of the social contract.

Rousseau realized the democracy as he envisioned it would be hard to maintain. The warned, “As quickly as any man says of the work of the State, what does it matter to me?’ the State may be offered up for lost.”

For Discussion and Writing

1. The the 4 philosophers disputed in this article, i beg your pardon two carry out you think differed the most? Why?

2. Which of the democratic forms federal government proposed by Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau do you think is the best? Why?

3. Rousseau composed in The society Contract, “As soon as any man claims of the to work of the State what does it matter to me?’ the State may be offered up because that lost.” What perform you think that meant? exactly how do girlfriend think his native relate to American democracy today?

A C T i V ns T Y

The philosophers Take a Stand

1. Divide the class into 4 groups, each taking on the function of Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, or Rousseau.

2. The members of every of the duty group will need to research why their thinker would agree or disagree with the debate topics provided below. The short article contains part clues, yet students should find out an ext about their philosophers’ views by utilizing the institution library and also Internet.

3. ~ research has actually been completed, each role group will state that is philosopher’s place on topic A. The groups should then conflict the topic from the allude of view of the thinker they are duty playing. Follow the same procedure because that the rest of the topics.

4. After every the arguments are finished, course members should talk about which one of the 4 philosophers castle agree v the most and why.

Debate Topics

A. The best kind of government is a representative democracy.

B. Just the chairman should have actually the strength to declare war.

C. A great way come make legislations is for every the human being to straight vote top top them.

D. Religion must be a part of the government.

E. The government should have the authority to confiscate a person’s residential property for the public good.

For further Information


Encyclopedia articles:

Wikipedia: cutting board Hobbes

Wikipedia: Leviathan

Internet Encyclopedia that Philosophy: thomas Hobbes

Stanford Encyclopedia that Philosophy: Hobbes’ Moral and Political Philosophy

Malaspina good Books: thomas Hobbes

Leviathan text of the book.

SparkNotes: Leviathan A study overview to the book.


Yahoo Directory: thomas Hobbes

Google Directory: cutting board Hobbes

Open catalog Project: thomas Hobbes


Encyclopedia articles:

Wikipedia: man Locke

Bluplete Biography: john Locke

Stanford Encyclopedia that Philosophy: man Locke

Internet Encyclopedia that Philosophy: man Locke

Wikipedia: two Treatises the Government

Second writing of Civil federal government Text the the book.

See more: " One Day At A Time Sweet Jesus Sheet Music Free Download, One Day At A Time Sheet Music

SparkNotes: Locke’s second Treatise of government Two Treatises of government A research guide.