Shock video clip indeed. In a textbook instance that cut both ways, this docu exploits/titillates and educates/informs in about equal measure if you occur to think that the cautionary theme around the excesses of the camera is as coherent as a shoot of a woman's human body in a freezer.

You are watching: Shock video 2002: america undercover


Shock video clip indeed. In a textbook situation that cuts both ways, this docu exploits/titillates and educates/informs in around equal measure if you occur to think the the cautionary theme around the excesses the the camera is as meaningful as a shooting of a woman’s human body in a freezer. The clip of crime videos — actual, re-enacted, even digitalized — is lurid, the stuff that churns the stomachs that jurors. Is anyone actually ready for an identified yet facially blurred video of fellatio amongst Bob Crane, his later on accused murderer and also a 3rd party? that ostensibly airs here because the court allowed a jury to see it.


Welcome come the comparatively new video courtroom, USA, where producer damn it Bailey and director Randy Barbato (who broadcast your first, an ext generalized “Shock Video” in ’93 ~ above HBO) record “the The show makes clear that once police started equipping themselves v fiber optic hand-helds, jurisprudence would never ever be the exact same again. On other fronts, viewers angry the courtroom-screened video of Vic Morrow and also two kids dying under the knives of a crashing chopper in the “Twilight Zone” trial.

The suggest is to reveal what juries research — including videotaped confession, the procedure begun in the at an early stage 1970s that historically introduced video clip evidence come the courtroom. The docu asks, in the words of narrator Peter Thomas, “Are we on the means to video justice or has video justice shed its way?”

“Shock Video,” as well off-putting and graphic to be aired on any kind of of TV’s regular tabloid shows, never answers its very own serious question. Maybe it’s enough to just air the question. Absolutely the visual difference between a cop’s handwritten report made use of by prosecutors and a wrenching video clip chronicle the the very same scene is ample justification for the usage of video.

~ above the various other hand, viewers see just how videos deserve to be distorted and digitalized by removing numbers from one photograph and also reinserting that person, such as the so late Brandon Lee (killed in a shooting accident ~ above a movie set), into one more piece of photographic footage.

that course, snippets the the O.J. Simpson and also Menendez trials are here, also Bruno Hauptmann’s 1935 Lindbergh-baby trial that ushered in the camera controversy, i m sorry didn’t resurface again till cameras to be allowed earlier into the courtroom in 1955.

broadcast concludes with affect of TV courtroom tv series on the yes, really courtroom habits of real lawyers and also relevant commentary about the merit that taping live executions (espoused by talkshow host Phil Donahue but ridiculed by author Dominick Dunne).

Leslie Abramson is illustrated as a lawyer that strenuously fought versus cameras in the Menendez courtroom but reaped a bonanza by playing to the lens elsewhere and becoming a TV lawyer star.

See more: How Far Is Nashville Tennessee From Pigeon Forge For Your Tennessee Vacation

“Shock Video” recalls pulpy, repulsive detective magazines, through their gory picture of cadavers in bloody bathrooms. However it asks major questions, if you ever get past the images.


America Undercover Shock video 2: The Show company of Crime and Punishment

(Sat. (15), 10:15-11:15 p.m., HBO)

Production:Filmed through America Undercover. Exec producer, Sheila Nevins; producer, fenton Bailey; director, Randy Barbato; camera, Sandy Schandler, Jamie McEwen; editor, Sonja Schenk;Crew:Camera together transforming the process and show organization of crime and also punishment."Cast:narrator, Peter Thomas. Music By: